Skip to main content

This is whom I would like to vote for...

By now I should be tired of all the negative political ads that I am being bombarded with. But because Penn State continues to remain at the forefront of local and, to a lesser extent, national news (Paternoville is now Nittanyville! Take the statue down! Camp out to defend the statue! The Paternos are conducting their own investigation! The Freeh Report is biased! Joe Paterno is a child rape enabler!), the ads are not affected me as negatively as they have in the past. Yet.

I read yesterday that Romney is outspending Obama. I was extremely surprised at this nugget. I would have put the ratio of Obama to Romney ads at about 4 to 1 in western PA, which would lead me to conclude the opposite. Because isn't PA supposed to be a battleground state? If so, why is it that it appears I am seeing mostly the mud-slinging by Obama's camp? Maybe this just occurs on the stations I am watching, but if any of you is seeing a lot of Romney ads, I would love to hear.

But speaking of mud-slinging and back to my post title, the candidate I want to vote for is the one who won't run a negative campaign towards the other. Again, this is a rare find, and both Obama's and Romney's campaigns are doing a bang-up job of cutting the other person down. I will say this: If I knew absolutely nothing about either candidate, if I based my vote on the ads I saw on TV, and if I did not care about negative ads, I would vote for Obama. His ads are making Romney look really bad and Romney does not seem to be fighting back all that much. But, again, maybe I am just missing those ads.
Related to that, the candidate I want to vote for is the one who tells me what he has done and what he plans to do, not what the other person did or did not do. Sure, if the other guy has been involved in something illegal, I think I am okay seeing that on TV. But don't tell me all the other bad things he did without telling me what you have done. Otherwise, why would I want to vote for either of you?

The candidate I want to vote for is the one who is honest. Unfortunately, I am so jaded by politics that I am not if there is an honest candidate out there running for a high(er) office. Show me the person who has not made one false claim. You probably cannot.

The candidate I want to vote for won't ever say, "That was taken out of context" or "That is not what I meant." There is certainly a chance that could happen, but so far both men have made excuses for things they have said along the way.

The candidate I want to vote for will admit when he does not know something and will be able to explain himself without coming up with more excuses or turning it on the other person. I need to look more into Bain and what it did and did not do. But as for outsourcing jobs, unfortunately, that is a sometimes part of doing business. We, as Americans, want to things cheaply, yet we get mad when things are made in China and jobs are shipped to India because it is cheaper. I know I am simplifying this, but you can't have it both ways.

So who will I be voting for come November? I am not entirely sure yet. But if someone else happens to throw his or her hat into the ring doing what I said I would like to see, it will be that person. And, no, I would not consider it throwing my vote away.


LaLa said…
Right on to pretty much all you said. Just don't think those people exist. Thats why I don't waste me time voting. But let me tell you about a little something they call a DVR. You don't have to watch commercials! :)
bluzdude said…
To me, the solution is simple. And I know you know which side I come down on, but this works either way.

First, toss out everything you see in commercials. In fact, don't even watch them. The most effective ads are the ones that go negative, and they're also usually the most misleading.

Second, figure out which issues are important to you and find out where each candidate stands. There are plenty of impartial websites that have this information. Just ask Uncle Google.

Third, pick the candidate that if for the most important things that you're for.

There, you've just eliminated the effect of all the billions of dollars spent on swaying your vote.

Would that everyone do so...
Facie said…
LaLa: I do think that there are decent people out there who run for office, but definitely not someone who would completely fit my bill. Probably about half of them start off as basically good people and then it goes downhill from there.

And, yes, I KNOW what a DVR is. But unfortunately, we don't have one for our upstairs TV; I cannot justify paying another 10 bucks per month just for that.

Bluz: I do ignore most of what I see in the ads, but I like your idea better. The thing is I am pretty well-informed. I feel worse for the people who base everything on the ads alone.

Interestingly enough, when I took a quiz at, I ended up with Ron Paul when I answered one way and... Wait for it... Wait for it... Obama when I answered the questions a different way. I think I heard some faint screams from most of my relatives just now.
Carpetbagger said…
I'm a leprechaun on a unicorn riding through the gum drop forest, and I approve this message! (And other candidates who don't exist)

Politics is a dirty business. I think what is really getting to you (and most of the rest of us) is how long and dragged out it all is. In Britain, once they call for an election, they have it in a month. If their is mudslinging, at least it's over quick.
Facie said…
Bagger: Nothing about politics bothers me more than what I wrote about, but you did remind me of what irks me to no end. Why does the campaigning start years in advance? It is ridiculous. I will never get the warm beer (among other things) in England, but it sounds as if they have something right!

Popular posts from this blog


Lately, I have had some anxiety. I have been waking up within an hour of when I fall asleep (partially because my bladder has its own timetable). And then I lie awake, worrying about various things. Mostly I worry that I am failing as a parent. I worry that I allow my child to be disrespectful to me more than she should. I worry that I am not forcing my shy child to do more things. And I worry that the few things I am pushing her to do will make her resent me. I worry that she gets stressed about school. I worry that she is bothered because she does not have a lot of friends. I worry because I don't know why that is.

I worry that we will be stuck in our house in our bad school district, a place where we would not send our child to high school when she graduates in two years (two years!). Then I worry that our somewhat introverted child will have to go to cyber school. Because there is just no way that we could afford to send her to Catholic high school, for which tuition is curren…

Why I am an "Other"

Last month while I was getting my driver's license picture taken, I tried to change my political party affiliation. For whatever reason, my choices were Democrat, Republican, Other, and None. But first, how I got there.

I registered as a Democrat when I first registered to vote, just before the '92 election. At that time, I was "kind of" liberal (for growing up in a somewhat rural area in western PA), and pretty much all of my relatives were registered that way, so it made sense. I was not really into politics at that young age, however.

As I got into my late 20s, I started to realize I was becoming more conservative, so a few years later, when it was time to renew my driver's license, I changed to Republican. I still remember the day at work when I told my coworker Anne that I was really a Republican. She told me she had known it for years. During the 2008 election, I was on board with John McCain running for president, mostly because I thought he was a good pe…

My first and hopefully my last biposy (or I would rather be at the beach)

This past Monday afternoon I had my biopsy. Up until Sunday night, I was not worried. In fact, I was never really concerned about having cancer; it was the needle part that bothered me. As it turns out, there is more than a needle; there is an actual incision. So it was not surprising that I only got a few hours of sleep. But on a positive note, I cruised right down the Parkway that morning, being the Monday before the 4th, so there was that.

I got there at the prescribed 30 minutes ahead of time; in fact, it was probably close to 35 minutes! I had to wait about 10 minutes, during which I could feel my seat vibrate (still not sure about that; I was tired but I don't think I was imaging it). Then I went back, changed, and waited in the "gowned waiting area" for no more than 5 minutes. Not even enough time to find out whose twins Jennifer Garner was pregnant with! WARNING: What follows will be detailed, though not too graphic.

Then I went back to a room, where someone as…